Top 25 Most Evil People of the Millenium

Dale F. Ogden
Libertarian
for
California State Assembly
Fifty-Fourth (54th) District

Top 25 Most Evil People of the Millennium
according to a New York Post Poll conducted
from 9/30/99 to 11/1/99 among NYPost.com users
Number of Votes Received: 19184

Rank	Perpetrator	Votes	%Vote
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25	Adolf Hitler Bill Clinton (write-in) Josef Stalin Pol Pot Dr. Josef Mengele Hillary Clinton (write-in) Saddam Hussein Adolf Eichmann Charles Manson Idi Amin Genghis Khan Jeffrey Dahmer Benito Mussolini Ayatollah Khomeini Ted Bundy John Wayne Gacy Ivan the Terrible Fidel Castro Jim Jones Vlad the Impaler Timothy McVeigh Slobodan Milosevic Marquis de Sade Mommar Khadafy Jack the Ripper	1,664 1,625 1,284 919 783 765 710 641 548 514 441 428 386 365 327 312 305 283 279 276 275 242 222 218 203	8.67 8.47 6.69 4.79 4.08 3.99 3.70 3.34 2.86 2.68 2.30 2.23 2.01 1.90 1.70 1.63 1.59 1.48 1.45 1.44 1.43 1.26 1.16 1.14 1.06

NOTE THE ONLY TWO WRITE-IN VOTES

Combine the Clintons' write-in votes (none of the other Top 25 Most Evil People were write-ins) and they become the number one ranked evil person of the millenium. Didn’t they always say we'd get two for one?

Rudy vs. Hillary

Rudy vs. Hillary...Who Should Win? An internet poll at vote.com asks that question. As of Day 13, Wednesday, March 8, 2000, at 04:23 am (in New York) the vote (out of 49,929 votes) was:

45,006 (90%) for Rudy Giuliani and
4,923 (10%) for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Only Hillary Milhous Clinton could create overwhelming support on the libertarian-leaning internet for an authoritarian like Rudy Giuliani. And yes, with a Rudy-Hillary choice, I'd vote for Rudy, too (and I did on vote.com). Ordinarily, I don't believe in voting for the lesser of two evils (I'd still be voting for evil) and would vote exclusively for Libertarians; however, if I were in New York, I'd have to vote for Rudy. Don't the Democrats know how much she damages them? She has crowded serious Democrats out of the election. I have to believe that somewhere in New York is a moderate Democrat who easily could have beat Giuliani. Hillary will not. Instead, while diverting millions of campaign dollars from serious Democrats running for other offices and in other states (not to mention diverting money and attention away from Al Gore), she will continue to generate money and support for Rudy and encourage conservative voters to show up in greater numbers.

Hillary Milhous Clinton is owed a great deal of gratitude by the Republican Party. Only through Hillary's attempt to foist socialist health care on the United States was the Republican Party able to obtain a majority in Congress (don't think for a minute it was the Republican "Contract with America") and keep it for six years. However, with Bill Clinton leaving the White House and Hillary no longer around to force her ultra-mega left-wing ideas on him, the voting public may no longer feel that it needs to keep quite so many Republicans in Congress, especially if George W. Bush or John McCain win the presidency.

"Vote.com is a fully interactive web site designed to give Internet users a voice on important public issues and other topics." Run by Bill Clinton's former political consultant, Dick Morris, some in the "traditional" media have criticized vote.com because it allows Dick Morris to pick the issues and offer (usually) only yes or no responses (sometimes I don't vote because none of the choices match my opinion). However, given how television "news" and the newspapers slant their news coverage, that is a bit like the "pot calling the kettle black." You may check here for an update on this poll.